. “Audiences would come to watch a film because of the filmmaker, not because of the new faces. It is hard to garner audiences on face value unless you make a film purely on a concept,” explains the critic.On the other hand, Murtaza points out that there is no strategy to launch a newcomer.. She says that though these actors are associated with big banners, good content was missing in their films. “Nepotism prevails in the industry. Even the Sunny Deol-backed thriller Blank, starring Dimple Kapadia’s nephew Karan, drew blank at the box office. “If these debutantes are directed by Karan Johar, SLB or Rohit Shetty, then the film will have a chance to be successful. Today, people want something that they relate to rather than someone else’s life living in abroad,” he shares.Sharmin Segal, Meezaan Jaffrey and Sanjay Leela Bhansali“The blend of established actors and newcomers is a safe deal. While Salman Khan might have garnered a good fan following for himself and his films, his success didn’t guarantee a safe landing for his protégés. Mayank backs this opinion, saying that the big face in the film will surely pull the audience to the cinema halls. Pranutan Bahl, granddaughter of the late renowned actress Nutan, and Zaheer Iqbal, Salman’s childhood friend’s son, were launched in Notebook and in spite of the film getting good reviews, the film failed to interest the audience.Talent vs contentEvery year, hundreds of films make it to the screen but only a few newcomers actually get the recognition..Pranutan Bahl, Salman Khan, Zaheer IqbalFilm critic Mayank Shekhar agrees that getting backed by big banners and producers is not enough to make any film a hit, though he agrees that they also need star directors or producers. “Gone are the days when people would enjoy Karan Johar or Yash Raj style of film making.Meanwhile, film critic Murtaza Ali Khan believes that making a film successful is not dependent on face value or the actors’ backgrounds anymore, there is a need for a strong concept. When Hrithik Roshan was launched in Kaho Naa.

Those include Ananya Pandey and Tara Sutaria whose début film Student Of The Year 2 didn’t do well at the box office. It is too much. In these films, they have been backed by the banners but nothing else,” explains Mayank, adding that people will not go and watch a film because Salman Khan’s name is mentioned on the poster. Good stories and concepts have great importance,” says Murtaza, who observes that there was a time when these big banners were able to pull the audiences to cinemas, but this is the time when the audience is wooed by realistic stories. Pyaar Hai, it was only him in the entire phase. “Either the newcomer should be padded by some known actor, or they should make a small budget film with a good conviction,” says the filmmaker. Similarly, the year also witnessed Javed Jaffrey’s son Meezaan being launched opposite Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s niece Sharmin Segal in Malaal. Trade analyst Rajesh Vasani explains that talent is just as important as the big banners. If they want to launch a newcomer they should plan, it can’t be just accessed,” he rues in conclusion. Student of the Year worked despite having newcomers was because it was directed by Karan Johar. Ultimately, it is the talent and content that always works. “Even if the big star is not dominating the film, and the other person is a new face, the audience will come and watch the film because it is a star-driven film. Any film works on the basis of its first teaser and trailer,” says Rajesh.The first half of 2019 has been a mixed bag in Bollywood which saw surprise hits in Uri and Kabir Singh while many big banners failed the box-office test, despite being backed by A-list production houses. While some do manage to garner interest, courtesy their famous parents, they fail to bring the audience to the cinema halls. Despite the ace director’s production house promoting the film and the newcomers, it failed to do well.

In the last few years, Salman Khan has launched careers of many Bollywood stars but the last few— namely Sooraj Pancholi-Athiya Shetty in Hero, Ayush Sharma in Loveyatri and now Parnutan and Zahir in Notebook— have failed to set the Box-office ringing. These actors get industry backing, but high-quality China Automatic Loading And Unloading CNC Cylindrical Grinding that doesn’t mean they have talent as well. Now it’s like every movie has a new face of someone’s child.“Audiences have evolved in many ways. Sonakshi Sinha was launched opposite Salman Khan in Dabangg and Sanya and Zaira starred with Aamir Khan in Dangal. Filmmaker Fauzia Arshi adds that just because big names and famous families are supporting the newcomer, it does not translate to their success. They should also have equal talent,” explains the analyst. “Every month we see one new face launched. While Deepika entered the limelight opposite Shah Rukh Khan in Om Shanti Om, Anushka too made her debut with Shah Rukh Khan in Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi. This begs the question of whether launching a new face with an established actor is a good idea, rather than all-new faces for the first time. And despite strong marketing and strategic promotions, some failed to get the cash registers ringing for their films. Fauzia too supports the idea of launching a newcomer with an established actor, so that the producer can recover the cost of the filmmaking. “It is not necessary that every newcomer, with some star producer or director’s backing, would work well, merely because he has a brand name.Backed by starsWhile bringing new talent to the screen is pivotal to the industry, it is also to be noted that actors like Deepika Padukone, Anushka Sharma, Sonakshi Sinha, Ranveer Singh, Priyanka Chopra, and most recently Sanya Malhotra and Zaira Wasim, were launched with established actors. It also saw a bunch of newcomers debuting in Bollywood. This element should be there, to begin with,” suggests the critic. Instead, there is a flood of all new faces. People want to see what they have not thought of,” she says

One wore a colourful Somali headscarf, in a nod to her Somali-American roots; the other, Rashida Tlaib, wore a maroon Palestinian thobe.The Tlaib episode is notable for several reasons. Millions watched it on the social media and on television. Tlaib’s use of inappropriate language is far beyond the narrow codes of decency that are viewed as permissible to most. The House majority leader, Democrat Nancy Pelosi, said she would not have used such words herself but that Tlaib’s words were certainly “nothing worse than (what) the President has said. Muslim-American organisations, many that balk at giving women, particularly women who do not cover their heads, leadership positions within their own organisations and boards, have been eager to embrace the two new emblems of Muslim-American leadership. It is not something that Muslim-American organisations (beyond those with a political and civil-rights bent) are inwardly enthusiastic about; it is, however, what they will regularly have to celebrate. That, however, is how it is — and in uttering the words, uncivil as they may have been, Rashida Tlaib has shattered more stereotypes than many generations of Muslim women put together. Given their roles within the Democratic Party’s progressive caucus, both Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar are slated to be the most liberal voices in Congress, a fact that is also likely to push once-conservative Muslim-America further to the left.Nearly every newspaper around the world covered the history-making event.

The freedom afforded to Tlaib in America is not a freedom she would enjoy in many parts of the Muslim world.Tlaib’s statement also reveals the turn that Muslims in America will have to take in the years to come. Not only will the face of Precision Grinding Machines for sale Muslims in America be female, it will be very outspoken and unafraid, and willing to fight a President who has made Islam the most suspiciously viewed religion in America.org, which has long opposed President Donald Trump and his policies. Many did. Few, Muslim or non-Muslim, would have guessed that one of the two new Muslim-American representatives would be the first to do so. Together, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib became the first Muslim women in the history of the US to become two of over 400 House representatives. Republicans, eager to find a reason to castigate the now winning and gloating Democrats — particularly a brown, Muslim and very progressive Democrat — were quick to denounce the language used by Tlaib. She stood by her words; she had said exactly what she had intended to say, and what she had meant to say. On Thursday, January 3, 2019, two Muslim-American women were sworn into the United States House of Representatives.These facts are notable because they are uncommon ones in other places where Muslim women hold office; in most Muslim-majority countries, not only would a woman be criticised for using what is deemed inappropriate language, the feeble protections that safeguard freedom of expression would readily be mowed over. Many agreed with her; a hashtag echoing her call for impeachment trended on Twitter for hours as angry Democratic supporters rallied in favour of Tlaib, noting that she had finally said what so much of the country has been thinking and saying.By arrangement with Dawn.And, yet, it is just such an expression of Muslim rage that is admissible given the bans, surveillance and demonisation that Muslim-Americans routinely face in Trump’s country. When asked to take the microphone, representative Tlaib recounted a conversation she had previously had with her son.

No sooner had the clip featuring Representative Tlaib hit the contentious airwaves of American cable news that it went viral. Far less noxious language used by Muslim women in political office in Muslim-majority countries has resulted in far greater consequences. And we’re going in there and we’re going to impeach the (expletive). Threatening Republican mobs did not gather outside her house, and while Trump did say that her comments were “highly disrespectful” and that she had “dishonoured herself” when specifically asked, he too was powerless to actually stop her from using similar language in the future. Through one or another rule or agency directive, she would face immediate consequences, likely even losing the power of her elected position. For starters, while she may have been criticised by certain news media outlets and Republican politicians, she did not face any actual consequences for her use of indecent language. “Bullies don’t win,” her son had told her. Many of the more than 100 American women elected to the House last week would have liked to give to the President a dose of what he has been dishing out to everyone else. Tlaib said she responded with, “Baby, they don’t. Such was the excitement about her thobe that a Twitter hashtag, #showyourthobe, asked other Palestinian-American women to also display their own embroidered traditional garments. Cameras followed the two everywhere, from the moment they arrived in the capital, to the time they along with their families celebrated after the oath of office was administered.President Trump has used some of the filthiest and profanity-laced language for women.This, however, was not how the hubbub over Rashida Tlaib’s swearing-in would end. The cameras that had been trailing the newly elected representative followed her to a reception held that evening by the progressive organisation MoveOn.For her part, Tlaib refused to apologise. The House minority leader immediately demanded an apology, using strong language to criticise Tlaib.” Other Democrats, particularly those belonging to the prim and trite “when they go low, we go high” Obama-Clinton camps, who have long insisted that they must stand for civility and not bow to the depths Trump plunges to, were also critical.” Applause followed and Tlaib quickly gave up the microphone. She was not officially censured; the US government did not begin any proceedings against her